The findings on gender influences on relationship experience assessment and willingness to enter a FWBR again are presented in their entirety in Figure 1. 12, p = 0.047, AR = 2.4. While men were more likely to say „yes“ to participating in a FWBR in the future, women appeared more likely to avoid them, [chi square](2) = , p < 0.001, AR = 4.4 and AR = 3.5, respectively.
14, p = 0.046, [chi square](2) = , p < 0.001, respectively), but only the latter also demonstrated significance of specific parameters. Overall, the effects of gender on relational outcomes verify the findings obtained through the chi-square contingency tables. Men were less likely than women to be uncertain or not want to enter a FWBR again (B = -0.953, p = 0.004, odds ratio = 0.4, and B = -1.285, p < 0.001, odds ratio = 0.3, respectively). These odds ratios are equivalent to women being 2.5 times more likely to be uncertain or 3.3 times more likely to want to avoid future FWBRs than men.
In both reasons to enter a FWBR and expectations from it, women were more likely than men to display wishfulness; and men were more likely than women to seek and expect sexual satisfaction and sex without commitment, [chi square](10) = , p < 0.001 (AR = 3.1, 4.7, and 2.4) for reasons and [chi square](6) = , p < 0.001 (AR = 3.9, 3.1, and 2.0) for expectations, respectively. At the same time, adjusted residuals pointed to no statistically significant differences in other categories of reasons and expectations. Men and women were very closely matched in most other reason categories but displayed more pronounced differences in expectations. The complete gender distribution of expectations of FWBRs is show in Fig.2 and of reasons for entering a FWBR in Fig.3.
MLR analysis regarding dating feel comparison and you may readiness to enter a great FWBR once again by the gender each other put statistically significant habits ([chi square](2) = six
Deciding on expectation satisfaction, the sole significant difference was a student in ladies are apt to be than just males (20.2% as opposed to 5.6%) (Fig.4) so you’re able to declare that the traditional were not satisfied having causes almost every other than just developing emotions otherwise emotional difficulty, [chi square](4) = , p = 0.014, AR = step 3.4.Continue reading