Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Meters. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Meters. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Evolution and you will People Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.
Cross-sectional study out of intimacy, hobbies, and you can partnership: Testing the latest assumptions of your own triangular principle away from like
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The area away from connection inside the human mating. Post on Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An excellent. (2002). Internet contradiction reviewed. Diary of Social Issues, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites paradox: A personal technology you to definitely decrease social wedding and you may emotional well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.Yards., & Industries, J. M. (2001). Amount, time, and you will lifetime of marriages and you can divorces. Most recent Inhabitants Reports, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Perception ideal regarding carrying out tough: Public evaluations within intimate relationship. Journal out-of Identity and you can Public Psychology, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Log away from Identity and you will Social Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to help you attractive selection: The latest evolved mindset of dating restoration. Progression and you may Person Decisions, 29(5), 343–349.Continue reading