U.S. Supreme Courtroom
1. A stipulation in a Farm financing home loan that, in case there is fit to foreclose, the mortgagor shall shell out a fair lawyer’s charge to-be set of the court, is legitimate in Federal Farm Loan work if valid in state rules. P. 292 U. S. 54 .
2. The purpose of the Farm mortgage operate is facilitate producers, by mortgaging their unique lands, to acquire loans at low priced, and that function is usually to be noticed in identifying what’s a reasonable attorneys’s fee in a foreclosures proceeding. P. 292 U. S. 57 .
Certiorari, 290 U.S. 620, to examine the affirmance of a decree foreclosing a farm loan home loan in which the trial courtroom had would not enforce a stipulation for a legal professional’s charge.
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Land-bank of Berkeley v. Warner
CERTIORARI TOWARDS THE SUPREME LEGAL OF ARIZONA
1. A stipulation in a Farm financing home loan that, in case there are suit to foreclose, the mortgagor shall shell out an acceptable attorneys’s fee to be repaired because of the court, is good according to the Federal Farm Loan Act if legitimate in condition legislation. P. 292 U. S. 54 .
2. the reason for the Farm Loan Act would be to equip farmers, by mortgaging their countries, to get debts at inexpensive, which purpose is usually to be seen in identifying what’s a fair lawyer’s fee in a foreclosure proceeding. P. 292 U. S. 57 .
Certiorari, 290 U.S. 620, to examine the affirmance of a decree foreclosing a farm financing mortgage wherein the test courtroom have refused to apply a stipulation for legal counsel’s fee.Continue reading