Eugene R. CLEMENT, Gay Ann Blomefield, and Neil Gillespie, independently as well as on part of people likewise set, Plaintiffs, v. AMSCOT BUSINESS, Defendant.
*1293 Scott J. Flint, Jonathan L. Alpert, Alpert, Barker, Rodems, Ferrentino & prepare, P.A., Tampa, FL, William J. Cook, Barker, Rodems & make, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Eugene R. Clement, Gay Ann Blomefield, Neil Gillespie, plaintiffs.
She regularly engaged in „deferred deposit“ deals by providing Defendant several non-postdated or postdated checks in return for profit
John A. Anthony, Gray, Harris, Robinson, Shackleford, Farrior, Tampa, FL, Christine Noworyta Smith, Gray, Harris & Robinson, P.A., Orlando, FL, for Amscot company, a Florida business, defendants.
Before the Court is actually Plaintiffs‘ Renewed movement for lessons qualifications and encouraging memorandum (Dkts. 89 and 92), Amscot’s Response in Opposition (Dkt.101), Plaintiffs‘ Notice of Supplemental Power (Dkt.93), Plaintiffs‘ Reply Memorandum (Dkt.114), and all sorts of depositions, displays, declarations, affidavits, and content on document.Continue reading