Up on to arrive into the laboratory, people finished written told consent. Participants had been resting from the a pc and questioned to complete a good questionnaire, which included a review out of personality and you can inquiries determining intimate companion being compatible. As with the previous training, grandiose narcissism try examined towards Narcissistic Character Directory (NPI ? = .86, Meters = , SD = 7.20) and you can Large Four character traits on the Larger Four Catalog (BFI) . To possess neuroticism, ? = .82; M = 2.77, SD = 0.80; to own extraversion, ? = .84, M = 3.46, SD = 0.72; to own openness to relax and play, ? = .75, Yards = step 3.55, SD = 0.58; to own conscientiousness, ? = .76; M = step three.67, SD = 0.56; and agreeableness, ? = .73, Meters = step 3.97, SD = 0.51.
So it survey wasn’t used for analysis as it was region of your own cover tale. People was in fact informed that the guidance they offered would be put to fit them up with someone on university that comparable welfare. Ultimately, gender, age, and you will dating standing had been examined.
Following the techniques in depth of the Parker and you may Burkley , users was indeed next found a picture of an objective personal and you will advised that considering its prior solutions, he’s “comparable hobbies” with this particular address. The ladies viewed an image of the male target and the people seen a picture of a lady target. This type of images had been pre-checked of the a ple because of their quantity of appeal having fun with a beneficial 10-area measure, in a fashion that step sitios de citas con strapon 1 = very unsightly and you can 10 = most attractive. This new mean get for the male photographs was six.62 (SD = step one.86) additionally the mean rating getting people photo is actually seven.03 (SD = 1.29). Eg Parker and you can Burkley, i including requested users a series of questions about this new participant’s interest in the goal, but all of our centered details was in fact only the items that analyzed partner poaching particularly. Solutions have been made towards the 5-point scales such that 1 = very unlikely and 5 = most likely. Stuff was in fact a great) “Exactly how more than likely might you feel to follow this person to have a good matchmaking?” (M = 2.43, SD = step one.28), and you can b) “Exactly how likely would you getting while making away with this specific personal?” (Meters = 2.38, SD = step one.34). We and additionally analyzed the newest extent that the brand new new member found the fresh target glamorous playing with an excellent 5-point scale in a way that step one = most unattractive and you can 5 = really attractive (Meters = step 3.76, SD = step 1.15).
Performance
We basic created every details before measuring analyses. I up coming computed correlations ranging from predictor/control parameters (the big Four variables) and you may result variables, being shown in Table six. Grandiose narcissism was coordinated with a heightened odds of kissing on target, yet not with locating the address glamorous or pursuing the target to have a romance.
I next joined parameters toward an effective regression model; number one details out of participants‘ matchmaking condition, target dating standing, sex, and you can NPI ratings have been registered to the Step one (managing having Larger Five details), the a couple-means interactions among top parameters have been registered for the 2, all of the three-way relationships certainly one of no. 1 parameters was indeed registered for the Step three, together with five-way communications one of number one details is inserted on the Step four. As the not one of four-ways relationships hit analytical advantages, 3 analyses is said inside the Dining table eight.
Users had been at random allotted to a description of the target just like the “single” or “when you look at the a romance” and you will have been next requested when deciding to take a preliminary survey on quantity of desire he has on address
For getting the prospective glamorous, merely fundamental outcomes to have intercourse and you may a participants‘ dating reputation was in fact high. Males was indeed more likely to select the target attractive than simply lady, and you can single men and women had been expected to discover target glamorous than connected some one. Grandiose narcissism wasn’t a beneficial predictor to find the mark glamorous as a whole (? = -.067, t = -0.913, p = .362) and you can grandiose narcissists did not look for connected aim as more attractive than unattached goals (? = -.052, t = -0.842, p = .401).